SecureCode FAIL?

November 12th, 2008

SecureCode® is a program by MasterCard to have another (useless?) number you type in to use your credit card with certain merchants. You may remember when the CVV2 code was the NEW BIG THING that people asked for to make sure you were really the person using the card. (IMHO, each of these is perfectly useless once that bit of information is stolen. It’s an arms race where card ‘acceptors’ keep looking for a new bit of info to ask for, and thieves keep stealing it).

Yesterday, while making a purchase, I was asked for my SecureCode® for a particular credit card. I don’t remember it off the top of my head, and it’s not stored in my normal encrypted file of passwords. On top of that, I use No Script, which can make some JavaScript interactions tricky the first time you do them. You have to choose what domains to allow to run script.

With all that, I couldn’t get the purchase to go through at first because I didn’t have my SecureCode® card number. So I tried to get it from the issuing bank website, and got caught in a round robin of being sent to the mastercard site, my bank, and the merchant site. But somehow, with the various enabling and disabling of scripts, I WAS ABLE TO BUY THE PRODUCT WITHOUT EVER ENTERING THE SECURECODE®. I don’t know how much of a security failure this is, if at all, but it makes me think that SecureCode® is just another useless step that annoys me, and makes sure I won’t buy from that merchant again.

Simplifying my reading

November 11th, 2008

For two months or so before the election, I put a lot of my online reading on hold. I would refresh every 5 minutes for political news, but everything else didn’t seem interesting. Google reader would often have 1000+ unread items.

Over the last few days, I’ve been removing subscriptions until I’m down to 151 total, and most of those are daily postings that I skim rapidly once a day, accessibility articles, or sites that I’m willing to actually READ (New Yorker, for example). My reading preferences have definitely skewed to short, scannable pieces of text over the last several years. Now I find they are swinging back to books and longer articles. Partly out of a fear that I’m missing in-depth coverage of topics while being up to date on the latest web minutia.

I’ll have to see where this goes - I’ve got a stack of books going back several YEARS that I want to read, and have never actually done so. I’m even thinking about cutting off all online reading of blogs except for coding/programming/accessibility info. I doubt I could last too long, but it would be interesting to see how much time I would find to read books instead.

Change.gov

November 7th, 2008

Obama GETS the internet: http://change.gov.

The Newsweek series I linked to previously talks about the New Media team in some more detail in Chapter 4 (print version for single page):

To the casual visitor, the New Media department at Obama headquarters seemed at once ultrahip and painfully earnest, a touchy-feely, emo sort of place where people talk about saving their souls and use lefty academic jargon like “agency.” One reporter described the sentiment toward the candidate as a sort of “Lincoln 2.0.” The frat brothers over in Communications liked to joke about whether the geeks in New Media were still virgins.

When it came to what they actually did, however, the nerds of New Media were cold realists. “We never do something just because it’s cool,” the campaign’s official blogger, Sam Graham-Felsen, told a NEWSWEEK reporter. “We’re always nerdily getting something out of it.” He showed off the Obama ‘08 iPhone application. With its deep Obama blues, correct fonts and glassy graphics, it looked like an electronic bauble for the well-heeled voter. Closer inspection revealed a sophisticated data-mining operation. Tap the top button, “call friends,” and the software would take a peek at your phonebook and rearrange it in the order that the campaign was targeting states, so that friends who had, say, Colorado or Virginia area codes would appear at the top. With another tap, the Obama supporter could report back essential data for a voter canvass (”left message,” “not interested,” “already voted,” etc.). It all went into a giant database for Election Day.

Early that summer, the campaign made the unorthodox decision to announce its vice presidential pick via text messages sent directly to supporters. It wasn’t just a trick to do something flashy with technology and attract media attention. The point was to collect voters’ cell-phone numbers for later contact during voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts. Thanks to the promotion, the campaign’s list of cell-phone numbers increased several-fold to more than 1 million. (Among the registrees: one Beau Biden, son of Joe.)

“I don’t care about online energy and enthusiasm just for the sake of online energy and enthusiasm,” said Chris Hughes, head of New Media’s social networking. “It’s about making money, making phone calls, embedding video or having video forwarded to friends.” There was nothing starry-eyed about Hughes, who had been the Harvard roommate and later partner of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and made his first millions before he was 24. His goal was to make old techniques—like call centers and getting polling information to voters—more efficient. “When computer applications really take off, they take something people have always done and just make it easier for them to do it,” he said. “And maybe bigger.”

The last two sentences capture what I try to do at work better than anything else I’ve read.

More election crack

November 5th, 2008

Newsweek is running a great series where they had reporters isolated from the magazine and website for a year, reporting on behind the scenes happenings under the agreement nothing would come out till after election day. Worth your time. And it gives even more weight to the fact that Sarah Palin is everything wrong about politics - narcissistic, shallow, and selfish.

More proof Obama IS the right choice

November 5th, 2008

All you have to do is look at the faces of the people around the world, and you know that this man is the better of the two choices we were given. America stands for something again, and it isn’t torture, war, or greed.